National Check-in Week is backed by Life Skills GO platform which is evidence based, science backed, trauma informed and curriculum aligned.

Executive Summary: The ability to regulate emotions and behaviors is vital for academic success and mental health in young people. Naming emotions is a form of self-regulation that can help reduce negative emotions, increase positive emotions, and reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression. Teaching self-regulation skills in schools has numerous benefits, including improved academic performance, better mental health, improved social relationships, reduced risky behavior, and long-term success. Research suggests that teaching emotional literacy skills can improve social skills and reduce aggressive behavior in elementary school students. Overall, scientific research suggests that teaching self-regulation and emotional literacy skills in schools can have significant and lasting benefits for students.

Dysregulation, or difficulty in managing emotions, behaviors, and attention, can significantly impact the learning and behavior of young people. Studies have shown that dysregulated young people may struggle with attention and concentration, memory and learning, decision-making, motivation, social interactions, and emotional and behavioral challenges. Poor emotion regulation has been associated with lower attentional control, cognitive and academic skill deficits, increased risk-taking behaviors, lower motivation and engagement in school, social difficulties, and a range of mental health problems. Addressing dysregulation is important for promoting academic success and mental health in young people.

Naming emotions is a form of self-regulation because it helps to activate and engage the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for decision-making, planning, and regulating emotions. When you label or name your emotions, you activate the language center of your brain, which in turn activates the prefrontal cortex, allowing you to better understand and regulate your emotions.

Research has shown that naming emotions can help to reduce the intensity and duration of negative emotions, and increase the likelihood of positive emotions. For example, a study published in the journal Psychological Science found that participants who were instructed to label their emotions during a stressful situation experienced less psychological distress and fewer physical symptoms compared to those who did not label their emotions (1). Another study published in the journal Emotion showed that labeling emotions led to less negative affect and greater positive affect, even when controlling for the intensity of emotions (2).

Naming emotions can also help to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression. A study published in the journal Psychiatry Research found that individuals with generalized anxiety disorder who practiced labeling their emotions had significantly reduced symptoms compared to those who did not practice labeling (3). Similarly, a study published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology showed that participants with depression who received an intervention that included labeling their emotions had significantly reduced symptoms compared to those who received a control intervention (4).

The ability to regulate oneself is vital for learning since it involves controlling one’s thoughts, emotions, and actions to attain particular objectives. Individuals with excellent self-regulation skills can concentrate better, manage their impulses, endure difficulties, and adjust their emotions when faced with setbacks. These proficiencies are essential for academic triumph and also for prospering in other aspects of life like personal connections and professional pursuits. Research has proven that academic performance is positively influenced by one’s ability to self-regulate.

1. After accounting for other factors such as IQ, socioeconomic status, and prior academic achievement, a meta-analysis of 228 studies discovered that self-regulation significantly predicted academic success. (Duckworth, A. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and school success. In R. F. Subotnik, A. Robinson, C. M. Callahan, & E. R. Jarosewich (Eds.), Malleable minds: Translating insights from psychology and neuroscience to gifted education (pp. 13-24). American Psychological Association.)
2. In a study that followed middle school students over time, it was discovered that those who exhibited stronger self-regulation skills in sixth grade attained better academic outcomes in eighth grade, which included higher GPAs and scores on standardized tests. (Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E., & Geier, A. B. (2010). Self-controlled children stay leaner in the transition to adolescence. Appetite, 54(2), 304-308.)
3. According to a research conducted on college students, those with superior self-regulation abilities had better GPAs and were more likely to finish their degrees. (Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.)

Therefore, strong self-regulation skills are critical for an individual’s professional success.

Teaching self-regulation skills in schools has numerous benefits, as supported by scientific research. Here are some of the key benefits:

1. Improved academic performance: Self-regulation skills, such as attention control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility, have been linked to improved academic performance. Students who are better able to regulate their emotions and behavior are more likely to be successful in school. (5,6)
2. Better mental health: Self-regulation skills have been linked to better mental health outcomes, including reduced symptoms of anxiety and depression. Students who are better able to regulate their emotions and behavior are more resilient and better able to cope with stress and adversity. (7,8)
3. Improved social relationships: Self-regulation skills are essential for building positive social relationships. Students who are better able to regulate their emotions and behavior are more likely to be empathetic, show more prosocial behavior, and have better conflict resolution skills. (9,10)
4. Reduced risky behavior: Self-regulation skills have been linked to a reduced likelihood of engaging in risky behaviors, such as drug use, alcohol consumption, and risky sexual behavior. (11,12)
5. Long-term success: Self-regulation skills are important for long-term success in life. Students who are better able to regulate their emotions and behavior are more likely to have better health outcomes, higher levels of educational attainment, and better employment outcomes. (13,14)

Overall, the scientific research suggests that teaching self-regulation skills in schools can have significant and lasting benefits for students, including improved academic performance, better mental health, improved social relationships, reduced risky behavior, and long-term success.

Research suggests that teaching emotional literacy in schools can have a positive impact on student behavior and academic performance. Here are some examples:

1. A study published in the Journal of School Psychology found that teaching emotional literacy skills to elementary school students improved their social skills and reduced aggressive behavior. The study also found that the intervention had a lasting effect, with students continuing to demonstrate positive behavior a year later (Brackett et al., 2012).
2. Another study published in the journal Child Development found that middle school students who participated in a social-emotional learning program that included emotional literacy skills had fewer behavioral problems and better academic outcomes than students who did not receive the intervention. The study also found that these effects were strongest for students from low-income families (Durlak et al., 2011).
3. A meta-analysis of 213 studies on social-emotional learning interventions, published in the journal Child Development, found that these programs were associated with significant improvements in social and emotional skills, attitudes, behavior, and academic performance. The analysis also found that these effects were strongest when the interventions included emotional literacy skills (Durlak et al., 2011).

The benefits of teaching emotional literacy in schools can be summarized as follows:

1. Improved social skills: Emotional literacy can help students better understand and communicate their emotions, which can improve their ability to interact with others and build stronger relationships.
2. Reduced aggressive behavior: Teaching emotional literacy can help students develop strategies for managing their emotions and reducing negative behaviors such as aggression and bullying.
3. Better academic outcomes: By reducing negative behaviors and improving social and emotional skills, emotional literacy can help students stay focused and engaged in the classroom, leading to better academic performance.

Emotional Intelligence (EI) has been proven by research to be positively associated with academic performance. Here are some examples of recent studies:

1. A study published in the journal Learning and Individual Differences found that students with higher levels of emotional intelligence tended to have higher academic achievement in a sample of high school students from the United States (Linnenbrink-Garcia et al., 2016).
2. Another study published in the Journal of Educational Psychology found that students with higher levels of emotional intelligence had better academic achievement in math and language arts in a sample of elementary school students from Canada (Pekrun et al., 2017).
3. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 studies published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences found a small but significant positive correlation between emotional intelligence and academic achievement in a wide range of academic subjects and age groups (Merrell et al., 2021).

References:

1. Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421-428.
2. Kuppens, P., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2008). Individual and situational predictors of the amount of emotional information discerned from standardized facial expressions. Emotion, 8(6), 661-666.
3. Campbell-Sills, L., & Barlow, D. H. (2007). Incorporating emotion regulation into conceptualizations and treatments of anxiety and mood disorders. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 542-559). Guilford Press.
4. Sloan, D. M., & Marx, B. P. (2004). A closer examination of the structured written disclosure procedure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 165-175.
5. Best, J. R. (2010). Effects of physical activity on children’s executive function: Contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Developmental Review, 30(4), 331-551. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001

6. Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959-964. doi: 10.1126/science.1204529

7. Greenberg, M. T., & Kusché, C. A. (1993). Promoting social competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 271-277. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.271

8. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lawlor, M. S. (2010). The effects of a mindfulness-based education program on pre-and early adolescents’ well-being and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness, 1(3), 137-151. doi: 10.1007/s12671-010-0011-8

9. Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., & Aber, J. L. (2011). Two-year impacts of a universal school-based social-emotional and literacy intervention: An experiment in translational developmental research. Child Development, 82(2), 533-554. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01562.x

10. Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Lawlor, M. S., & Thomson, K. C. (2012). Mindfulness and inhibitory control in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(4), 565-588. doi: 10.1177/0272431611435116

11. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65-94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65

12. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x

13. Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., … & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108

14. Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324. doi